Reeja George Pulinilkunnathil
Impact of calf feed subsidy scheme on farm women - Mannuthy Department of Extension, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 1999
The impact of the calf feed subsidy scheme, a continuing
dairy development scheme of the Animal Husbandry Department,
Kerala, on farm women in terms of behavioural changes in the
areas of attitude, knowledge and extent of adoption regarding
scientific calf and dairy management practices was assessed.
A static group comparison design of research was adopted.
The study was carried out in Thrissur district of Kerala
state, among 75 each of beneficiary and and non-beneficiary
women.
The non-beneficiary group served as the control.
Comparison was made on 11 variables and since it was required
to know differences in the attitude towards scientific calf
rearing, knowledge of scientific calf rearing, extent of
adoption
of
calf
rearing
as
well
as
dairy
farming
technologies between beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups
and since ready to use measuring scales were not available to
measure these variables, suitable scales were developed.
In general, beneficiary women differed significantly in
their
attitude,
knowledge
and
extent
of
adoption
of
scientific
calf
rearing
and dairy
farming
technologies
indicating the positive impact of the scheme.
However
certain deficiency areas were identified which need immediate
educational
intervention. For instance, most
beneficiary
women
did not
have correct knowledge regarding early
breeding as well as etiology of infertility; two-third' had
not adopted these technologies as well.
Many of beneficiary
women did not have correct knowledge of the schedule of foot
and mouth disease vaccination as well as deworming and a
majority had either discontinued or not adopted these
technologies.
Fewer women had correct knowledge of the
amounts of green fodder and ration to be fed to heifers, dry
animals and
those pregnant: adoption of these technologies
was substantially low.
Knowledge and adoption of the correct
procedure of ligation of navel cord was one low. None of the
beneficiaries had adopted post milking teat dipping while a
few had adopted record keeping.
Nearly half of the
beneficiaries had not adopted the practice of quick reporting
of out breaks and had either not adopted or discontinued
technologies pertaining to flooring and drainage in cattle
sheds.
Two-third had not adopted the practice of culling
bull calves at the right time.
To make up these deficiencies,
intensive extension
educational measures are to be organised under the auspices
of the scheme.
In all such instances, women participatory
programs
need
emphasis.
Attitude
building
exercises,
demonstrations etc wherever required should be organised and
followed up.
636.007 / REE/IM
Impact of calf feed subsidy scheme on farm women - Mannuthy Department of Extension, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 1999
The impact of the calf feed subsidy scheme, a continuing
dairy development scheme of the Animal Husbandry Department,
Kerala, on farm women in terms of behavioural changes in the
areas of attitude, knowledge and extent of adoption regarding
scientific calf and dairy management practices was assessed.
A static group comparison design of research was adopted.
The study was carried out in Thrissur district of Kerala
state, among 75 each of beneficiary and and non-beneficiary
women.
The non-beneficiary group served as the control.
Comparison was made on 11 variables and since it was required
to know differences in the attitude towards scientific calf
rearing, knowledge of scientific calf rearing, extent of
adoption
of
calf
rearing
as
well
as
dairy
farming
technologies between beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups
and since ready to use measuring scales were not available to
measure these variables, suitable scales were developed.
In general, beneficiary women differed significantly in
their
attitude,
knowledge
and
extent
of
adoption
of
scientific
calf
rearing
and dairy
farming
technologies
indicating the positive impact of the scheme.
However
certain deficiency areas were identified which need immediate
educational
intervention. For instance, most
beneficiary
women
did not
have correct knowledge regarding early
breeding as well as etiology of infertility; two-third' had
not adopted these technologies as well.
Many of beneficiary
women did not have correct knowledge of the schedule of foot
and mouth disease vaccination as well as deworming and a
majority had either discontinued or not adopted these
technologies.
Fewer women had correct knowledge of the
amounts of green fodder and ration to be fed to heifers, dry
animals and
those pregnant: adoption of these technologies
was substantially low.
Knowledge and adoption of the correct
procedure of ligation of navel cord was one low. None of the
beneficiaries had adopted post milking teat dipping while a
few had adopted record keeping.
Nearly half of the
beneficiaries had not adopted the practice of quick reporting
of out breaks and had either not adopted or discontinued
technologies pertaining to flooring and drainage in cattle
sheds.
Two-third had not adopted the practice of culling
bull calves at the right time.
To make up these deficiencies,
intensive extension
educational measures are to be organised under the auspices
of the scheme.
In all such instances, women participatory
programs
need
emphasis.
Attitude
building
exercises,
demonstrations etc wherever required should be organised and
followed up.
636.007 / REE/IM