Evaluation of dragon fruit (hylocereus spp.) genotypes grown in Kerala (Record no. 289233)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 07834nam a22001937a 4500
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 634.1
Item number KEE/EV PG
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Keerthana Sethunath
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Evaluation of dragon fruit (hylocereus spp.) genotypes grown in Kerala
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Vellanikkara
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Department of Fruit Science, College of Agriculture
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2021
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 117p.
502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE
Dissertation note M Sc
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract Dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.) commonly known as the pitaya, is a perennial
climbing vine belonging to the Cactaceae family. The present work carried out in the
Department of Fruit Science during the period 2019-2021 to study the morphology,
flowering, yield and quality attributes of dragon fruit grown in four districts of Kerala
(Thiruvananthapuram, Pathanamthitta, Ernakulam and Thrissur) is of vital importance
with respect to the popularity dragon fruit has gained within a very short span of time
in Kerala. A total of 100 plants, 10 each from 10 different locations were evaluated
based on the UPOV descriptor guidelines to characterise the different genotypes that
are being cultivated in Kerala. The plants were denoted as P1 to P10, prefixed with the
first two letters of the location to which they belong.
The commercial cultivation of dragon fruit in Kerala was found to be dominated
by the dark pink/purple fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus costaricensis). Within this
species, more than one genotype was identified. The stem, flower, yield and quality
attributes were found to vary widely. The stem characters included stem segment length
(33-210 cm), stem segment width ((1.80-6.60cm), distance between areoles (2.00-5.50
cm), arch height (1.00-4.20 cm), stem waxiness (strong and weak), stem sturdiness
(high and low), margin of rib (convex and flat), number of spines per areole (3-5), spine
colour (medium brown and dark brown), height of the pole (6.5-8 ft with 1-2 ft buried
underground), number of branches (numerous) and number of stem segments per
branch (1-6).
Variations were also observed for the flower characters such as bud shape (ovate
and elliptic), shape of bud apex (acute and rounded), secondary colour pattern of sepal
(slightly red edged and red edged), intensity of red colour on bracts (weak, medium and
strong), length of style (23.50-31.00 cm) and number of stigma lobes (26-36). The yield
characters studied were fruit weight (84-896g), length of fruit (4.60-10.40 cm), width
of fruit (4.40-10.40 cm), length/width ratio of fruit (1.00-1.21), number of bracts (18-
50), length of apical bract (3.00-6.30cm), width of base of the bract(1.40-5.70 cm),
position of bracts towards the peel (adpressed, slightly held out and strongly held out),
fruit weight without peel (52-592 g), fruit shape (oval or spherical), colour of peel
2
(medium pink and dark pink), flesh colour (dark pink and purple) and yield per post (5-
20 kg per year based on the age of the plants). The values ranged from 11 to 18 °B with
respect to the TSS of the fruits whereas the titrable acidity was found to be 0.12 per cent
in all the fruits. The plants KoP1 to KoP10 from Kozhenchery received the maximum
score for appearance, taste, flavour, after taste and overall acceptance.
Plants came into bearing within 1.5 to 2 years of planting when stem cuttings
were used as the planting material. The duration from flower bud initiation to anthesis
was 12-15 days in general and anthesis took place during the night time after 10 p.m. If
the pollination was successful, fruit could be visible after 5 to 7 days of anthesis and the
harvest was possible in 23-25 days from fruit set i.e., one month after anthesis. When
the phenology of the plants was studied, flowering started in the month of March in two
locations (Athikkayam and Vaniyampara) whereas in all the other locations, it started
in the month of April. The flowering season extended till September to October. The
fruiting season started exactly one month after the anthesis and ceased one month after
the flowering has stopped, i.e., April to November.
As dragon fruit was a perennial crop, different orchards were grouped into three
phases based on the age of the plants, namely the establishment phase (0-2 years), yield
increasing phase (2-4 years) and yield stabilizing phase (4 years and above).
Considering the phases, total cost of cultivation was calculated and it was found to be
₹8,29,393 per year per hectare. The maximum cost during establishment phase was
incurred for the planting material and construction of posts. During the maintenance
phase, maximum expenditure was for the manure and fertilizer application. Average
yield per year per hectare was observed to be around 21 tonnes and the average price
received by farmers was ₹174 per kg. Net return from one hectare was around
₹27,32,768. The B:C ratio was 4.29 when the farmers received ₹174 per kg fruit. The
B:C ratio obtained with the least price (₹120 per kg) was 3.04. Being a highly
remunerative crop, area under dragon fruit cultivation was found to be expanding year
after year, as more under-utilized lands are being brought under this crop.
Major constraint identified in the cultivation of dragon fruit was the bud and
flower drop due to excessive and continuous rainfall during the flowering season. Weed
3
growth was also found to be a major problem. The source of planting material in all the
locations under study were found to be either from Malaysia or Cambodia. Since dragon
fruit was a crop introduced recently to India, the incidence of pests and diseases were
less compared to other fruit crops. But the menace caused by ants was common and
rarely, mealy bugs and beetles were found. Fruits were found to be damaged by birds.
Disease symptoms similar to canker were observed on the fruits and stem in one of the
locations. Physiological disorder like yellowing during extreme summer was common
in most of the orchards and these symptoms vanished immediately after a shower or
with irrigation.
The variability within the species was analysed using statistical techniques like
factor analysis and cluster analysis. Maximum variability (59.38%) in the stem and
flower characters was explained by two dimensions. The characters that contributed to
the variability were intensity of red colour of bract, stem waxiness, stem sturdiness,
margin of rib, spine colour, bud shape, bud apex shape, number of stigma lobes, length
of style and distance between areoles. Similarly, maximum variability (62.74%) in the
quality attributes were contributed by the first two dimensions out of four significant
dimensions. The characters responsible for creating the variability were fruit weight,
position of bract towards peel, fruit width, fruit weight without peel, fruit length, flesh
colour, fruit shape, width of base of bract, length of apical bract, outer TSS, TSS-acid
ratio and core TSS.
Cluster analysis of the qualitative traits formed six different clusters. When the
mixed data with both qualitative and quantitative characters were analysed through
clustering, there were three clusters based on the stem and flower characters and four
clusters based on the yield and quality attributes, which indicated variability within the
species.
Other species of Hylocereus namely H. undatus and H. megalanthus, and other
types known as Bruni and Frankis Red imported from countries like Thailand and
Vietnam are also under cultivation by farmers and are getting popular in different parts
of Kerala.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Dragon fruit
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Hylocereus spp.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Fruit Science
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Jyothi Bhaskar (Guide)
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810189343
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Item type Theses
Holdings
Not for loan Collection code Permanent location Current location Shelving location Date acquired Full call number Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
  Reference Book KAU Central Library, Thrissur KAU Central Library, Thrissur Theses 2022-04-08 634.1 KEE/EV PG 175179 2022-04-08 Theses
Kerala Agricultural University Central Library
Thrissur-(Dt.), Kerala Pin:- 680656, India
Ph : (+91)(487) 2372219
E-mail: librarian@kau.in
Website: http://library.kau.in/