PhD

A series of investigations were undertaken entitled “ Status and availability of sulphor in the major paddy soils of Kerala and the response of rice to sulphatic fertilizers” at College, of Hortculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara from 1990 to 1994 with the objectives: (i) to assess the sulphor status of major paddy soils of Kerala (viz. alluvial and brown hydromorphic) (ii) to identify and appropriate soil test procedure for estimation of available sulphor in these soils (iii) to determine the critical levels of sulphor in the soils and plant (iv) to study the response of rice to two popular sulphatic fertilizers of Kerala (viz. ammonium sulphate and ammonium phosphate sulphate) and (v) to assess the sulphur use efficiency of 35S labelled ammonium sulphate and ammonium phosphate sulphate.
The studies were conducted in four parts. In Part 1 of the studies, 105 samples each from alluvial and brown hydromorphic soils were collected from 10 rice growing districts of Kerala based on area under rice crop, estimated soluble SO4-S, adsorbed SO4-S, total sulphur content and organic + non sulphate sulphur contents. The soils were classified in to categories of low, medium and high based on the available SO4-S extracted by CaCl2. From this part of the study it was found out that 56 per cent of alluvial soils and 83 per cent of brown hydromorphic soils were deficient in sulphor. Sulphur deficient locations and sulphur sufficient locations were delineated. Sulphur status map for rice soils of Kerala was prepared.
In Part II, representative soils belonging to three status categories (low, medium and high) were collected from 30 locations each of alluvial and brown hydromorphic types and conducted a pot culture with two treatments (S0 and S40 kg S ha-1) with two replications. These soils were analysed with 12 methods of sulphur estimation using different extractants. The relative yield of grain, straw and total biomass and relative uptake of nutrient S were estimated. Correlations between relative yields and sulphur extracted by different methods were studied. From this the suitability of the methods were evaluated. It was found that all the 12 methods studied could extract available SO4 – S satisfactorily.
Scatter diagrams were drawn with relative yields of grain, straw, biomass and uptake of S against the sulphur extracted by different extractants. The critical levels were worked out following the Cate and Nelson procedure. The best suitable extractants for the estimation of sulphur in alluvial soil and brown hydromorphic soil were found out by assessing the responsiveness of rice in soils classified as deficient by each extractant. It was observed that in alluvial soil the critical levels varied between 5 to 22 ppm for different extractants. Monocalcium phosphate was to be the best extractant for alluvial soils. In brown hydromorphic soil the critical levels varied between 6 ppm to 20 ppm. Monocalcium phosphate + acetic acid was found to be the best extractant for brown hydromorphic soils.
Relationship between plant content of S and relative yield of grain studied by Cate and Nelson procedure showed that in alluvial soil 0.075 per cent S and in brown hydromorphic soil 0.08 per cent S in plant at harvest were critical concentrations below which response to applied sulphur can be expected.
In Part III of the studies, two locations having sulphur deficiency, one each falling under alluvial and brown hydromorphic soil, were selected for field experiments (CSRC, Karamana – alluvial and RARS, Pattambi –brown hydromorphic). Field experiments were conducted in these two locations for two seasons (Kharif and Rabi 1992-93) with nine treatments (control – S0, 4 levels of ammonium sulphate – S10, S20, S30, and S40 and 4 levels of ammonium phosphate sulphate - S10, S20, S30, and S40 kg S ha-1 in 2x4+1 factorial RBD with 3 replications). The results revealed that sulphur levels significantly increased yield of grain and straw and growth attributes like productive tillers. Sink capacity and dry matter production were increased by sulphur application. Among the two sources ammonium phosphate sulphate was found to be superior to the other. Agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency and apparent recovery efficiency showed that the efficiencies were maximum at low level of sulphur (10 kg S ha-1). Sulphur levels increased, S, N and K uptake. The ratios of nutrients removed per ton showed that the ratios of these nutrients to sulphur narrowed down with sulphur application over control. The gross income, net income and B: C ratio were higher for sulphur application and the highest values were for 30 kg S ha-1. The physical optimum levels ranged between 25.34 to 31.47 and the economic optimum levels ranged between 23.06 and 28.73 for the sources in two locations at the two seasons. The economic optimum levels of AS and APS were 27 and 25 kg S ha-1 respectively. There was no residual effect in general, except that at brown hydromorphic soil sulphur @ 40 kg ha-1 could contribute to meet the requirement of sulphur for the succeeding crop in producing more grain yield.
In Part IV of the studies, a pot culture experiment with 35 S labelled AS and APS was conducted at Radiotracer lab. The radioassay and chemical analysis were conducted. The soil and levels of S were same as that of field experiment.
The specific activity of grain and straw increased with higher levels of 35 S application. The sulphur use efficiency in alluvial soil was highest at sulphur rate of 20 kg S ha-1. In brown hydromorphic soil sulphur use efficiency was highest at 30 kg S ha-1. Sulphur taken up from fertilizer significantly increased with sulphur levels in both the soils. A-values were on par for different levels in both the soils. Brown Bydromorphic soil showed higher A-value, sulphur use efficiency and total sulphur taken up from fertilizer.