000			05560nam a2200181Ia 4500
999			_c27133 _d27133
003			OSt
005			20220304141111.0
008			140128s9999 xx 000 0 und d
082			_a630 _bRAJ/ST
100			_aRajesh G
245			_aStandardisation of mat nursery for rice
260			_aVellanikkara _bDepartment of Agronomy, College of Horticulture _c2003
502			_bMSc
520	3		_aA field experiment was conducted during May to September 2002 at the Agricultural Research Station, Mannuthy, Thrissur to develop a suitable production package for rice mat nursery, evaluate it under mechanical transplanting and develop it as a substitute for conventional nursery for manual planting. The s~dy consisted of three experiments. (J) Raising of sixteen types of mat nurseries using . . four different media in two ratios under two systems (dry and wet) and its evaluation. (II) Mechanical transplanting of these sixteen types of mat nurseries along with manual planting of conventional nursery and crop performance study. (Ill) Manual transplanting of sixteen types of mat nursery along with conventional nursery and crop evaluation. Experiment-I was designed in GRD, while experiment-II and experiment-Ill were laid out in Randomised Block Design, with two replications each. Rice variety Kanchana, was tried in the experiment. Results revealed that soil+ cow dung in the ratio 2: 1 in the mat produced taller seedlings and coir pith compost produced shorter seedlings. Presence 'of cow dung produced dark green seedlings with maximum number of healthy and minimum number of weak seedlings. Soil+ cow dung in the ratio 2:1 produced heavy mats under both systems. Presence of chaff in the media resulted in stronger mats. The performance of the transplanter, as it is a fixed parameter for the machine was unaltered by the different media and systems of nursery. But generally, the , '. number of missing hills was lower under dry system, compared to wet system. In case of experiment-Il, a higher plant population of 65 hills m-2 was seen associated with the crop raised under manual planting using conventional nursery. But the same crop produced a significantly lower number of tillers hill-1 throughout its growth period and the crop had 9.5 tillers nnr', at the time of harvest. The physiological growth attributes, observed through CGR, RGR and NAR was distinctively lower for the manuaIIy planted crop using conventional nursery in the initial stages of growth, but the trend disappeared in the later stages, indicating a uniform rate of growth. The insect pest attack was uniform without any variation due to treatments. Incidence of BLB was higher in case of mechanically planted crop using soil+ coir pith compost in 2: 1 ratio under dry nursery and soil+ coir pith raw in 2:] ratio under wet nursery. Among the yield components, number of 'panicles m-2 and test weight were not altered by the treatments. The maximum number of filled ,grains panicle" was seen in case of soil+ cow dung in the ratio 2:] ,as the media under dry system (61). However, the final grain and straw yield remained unaffected due to the various treatments with a mean value of 4344 and 7464 kg ha" respectively. The NPK content of the grain and total uptake ofP and K by the crop were influenced by the various treatments. Under dry system soil+ coir pith raw and soil+ chaff in the ratios 2: 1 and in wet system soi1+ cow dung in the ratio 1:2 and soil+ coir pith compost in the ratio 2: 1 were economically superior and can be the mat nursery media for mechanical transplanting. The use of mat nursery instead of conventional nursery did not prolong the time required for manual planting. Conventional nursery recorded a lower tiller production (8.8 at the time of harvest). Similar level of tiller production was seen in cases of soil+ chaff in either of the ratios and soil+ coir pith raw in the ratio 1:2. The pest and disease incidence, except rice bug, did not show any discrimination between the treatments. SoiI+ chaff in the ratio ]:2 under dry system had a higher population of bugs (2.7 per hill). Soil+ coir pith raw in the ratio 2: 1 under both the systems had the highest number of panicles m-2 i.e., 352 and 341, respectively. Conventional nursery had the lowest number of filled grains panicle" (31). The grain yield was unaffected, due to treatments and the mean grain yield was 4441 kg ha-I. Straw yield was influenced by the different treatments. A very low harvest index value of 0.3 was recorded for the crop. Crop raised using conventional nursery had a very low B:C ratio (l.05) and all mechanically planted crops had higher B:C ratio than this. As the grain yield was not affected due to the various treatments, the selection of mat should be based basically on economic consideration. Soil+ coir .pith raw as well as soil+ chaff in the ratio of 2: 1 under dry system, and soil+ cow dung in the ratio] :2 and soi1+ coir pith compost in the ratio 2:], under wet system could be a better option for mechanical transplanting based on the economics. Soil+ cow dung in 1:2 ratio and soi1+ chaff in 2: 1 ratio under both systems, and soil+ coir pith raw in 1:2 ratio under dry system and soil+ coir pith raw in 2: 1 ratio under wet system were found economically suitable. for manual planting.
700			_aJaikumaran U (Guide)
856			_uhttps://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810155188
942			_2ddc _cTH