a
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4022
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lizy, M J | - |
dc.contributor.author | George, K C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jacob Thomas, M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-23T04:45:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-23T04:45:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1988 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Agricultural Research Journal of Kerala, 26(1), 102-108. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4022 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A uniformity trial on colocasia was conducted at the College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala Agricultural University, during kharif 1984. Biometrical observations on 16 characters as indicated in Tables 1,2 and 3 were taken from all plants. The nature of soil heterogeneity was studied from the productivity contour map. The map revealed that the field could be considered heterogeneous in nature. Based on the mean square analysis, we could not predict any general trend of fertilty variation existing in the field. The low serial correlation coefficients established that fertile areas occur in patches. The'b' value was found higher for yield than for other characters. While comparing all the four methods we could assume that the method of serial correlation, is more reliable than all other methods. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kerala Agricultural University | en_US |
dc.subject | Assessing soil heterogeneity | en_US |
dc.subject | soil heterogeneity | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of different statistical techniques for assessing soil heterogeneity | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Reprints |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
26_1_102-108_0002-1628.pdf | 724.71 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.