Skip navigation
DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Issue Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
  • Sign on to:
    • My DSpace
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
DSpace logo



  1. Kerala Agricultural University Digital Library
  2. 1. KAUTIR (Kerala Agricultural University Theses Information and Retrieval)
  3. PG Thesis
a
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6261
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSelvin Jebaraj Norman-
dc.contributor.authorMukundan, K-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-11T10:23:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-11T10:23:59Z-
dc.date.issued1982-
dc.identifier.citation171161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6261-
dc.description.abstractThe present investigation on the production and marketing of vegetables (pumpkin and ashgourd) in Malappuram district was undertaken during the year 1981-82 to estimate the cost of cultivation, cost of production, benefit-cost ratio, price spread and to identify the marketing channels. The study was also aimed at identifying the problems of the farmers. Stratified multistage random sampling was adopted for the study. Costs A1, CostsA2, Cost B and Cost C per hectare were Rs.3457.39, Rs.4439.65, Rs.4984.49 and Rs.7898.16 respectively for pumpkin and Rs.3075.75, Rs.4072.80, Rs. 4603.25 and Rs.7324.97 respectively for ashgourd. The largest single item of input was human labour for pumpkin and ashgourd. In both the cases in terms of costs of operation irrigation was the most important item. The output of pumpkin was 14227.61 kg per hectare and it was 17201.03 kg per hectare for ashgourd. At the prices at which farmers sold these products, gross value of output was Rs.9796.66 for pumpkin and Rs.11362.13 for ashgourd, respectively. Cost of production per kilogram of pumpkin based on Cost A1, Cost A2, Cost B and Cost C were Re.0.21. Re.0.31, Re.0.35 and Re.0.56 respectively. For ashgourd they were Re.0.17, Re.0.24, Re.0.27 and Re.0.43 in the same order. Benefit-cost ratios based on Cost A1, Cost A2, Cost B and Cost C were 2.83, 2.21, 1.97 and 1.24 for pumpkin and 3.69, 2.79, 2.47 and 1.55 for ashgourd respectively. Farm business income for pumpkin was Rs.6339.27 per hectare and for ashgourd it was Rs.8286.38. Owned farm business incomes were Rs.5367.01 and Rs.7289.33 for pumpkin and ashgourd respectively. Family labour income for the production of pumpkin and ashgourd were Rs.4812.17 and Rs.6758.88 respectively. Net income for pumpkin was Rs.1898.50 and for ashgourd Rs.4037.16. Farm investment income for pumpkin and ashgourd were Rs.2443.74 and Rs.4567.61 respectively. Return over variable cost of ashgourd were Rs.3566.01 and Rs.5696.73 respectively. The predominant marketing channel was producer- wholesaler- retailer- consumer. About 50 per cent of the consumers’ rupee went to the middlemen in the marketing of both of pumpkin and ashgourd and hence the price spread was high. It was also found that the profit margin of intermediaries were very high, indicative of marketing inefficiency.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Agricultural Economics, College of Horticulture, Vellanikkaraen_US
dc.subjectCost studiesen_US
dc.subjectLiteracyen_US
dc.subjectOccupationen_US
dc.subjectCost conceptsen_US
dc.subjectItem wise cost per hectareen_US
dc.subjectOperation wise cost per hectareen_US
dc.subjectInput wise cost per hectareen_US
dc.subjectPumpkin-
dc.titleProduction and marketing of vegetables in Malappuram districten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:PG Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
171161.pdf2.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Theme by Logo CINECA

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback