a
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7845Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Gopinathan Unnithan, V K | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Laly John, C | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-12T05:16:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-12T05:16:58Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1984 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | T-384 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.sici | T-384 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7845 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The genotypic stability analyses of Eberhart and Russell (1966), Perkins and Jinks (1968), Freeman and Perkins (1971), Wricke (1966) and Shukla (1972) were studied in detail. The mistakes in the analysis of variance of Perkins and Jinks (1968) were corrected. The first three analyses which used the theory of regression explains a large part of the genotypic environment interaction. On the otherhand, when the regression cannot explain a large part of the genotype - environment interaction, Wrioke's ecovalence ratio and Shukla's stability variance could satisfactorily be used. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Department of Statistics, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Mannuthy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Phenotypic stability | en_US |
| dc.subject | Genotype environment interaction | en_US |
| dc.subject | Stability variance | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of different techniques for the estimation of genotype-environment interaction | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | PG Thesis | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.