Farmer-labourer relationship in rice production systems -a case study

Abstract

The study was undertaken with the objective of analyzing the farmer – labourer relationship in paddy production systems. The study was conducted in two districts of Kerala namely, Thiruvananthapurm and Alapuzha representing two distinctly different paddy production systems. Dyadic approach was used in the conduct of the study and altogether 150 farmer – labourer dyads were selected, 75 dyads each from the selected districts using random sampling. The farmer – labourer relationship was measured with the help of a scale developed for the study having 33 items. A pilot study was conducted for the selection of items to be included in the scale. The response for the items was obtained on a 5 point continuum with bipolar adjectives at the extreme ends as in the case of semantic differential technique. The data on farmer – labourer relationship and on 11 common variables, 7 farmer – related variables and 4 labourer – related variables were collected using a structured interview schedule. The relationship dimensions identified empirically were ‘facilitation’, ‘empathy’, ‘equity’, ‘tolerance’, ‘guidance’, ‘recognition’, ‘economic’, ‘social’ and ‘priority’. In general, a little more than half of the farmer – labourer dyads had high relationship. Like wise, in case of relationship dimensions such as facilitation, equity, tolerance, guidance, social and priority majority of the dyads came under high group. There was no significant difference between the overall relationship of the two study districts and among the three union membership categories. However, there was significant difference between the labourer categories with male labourers having significantly higher relationship than their female counterparts. The dimension – wise performance of farmer – labourer dyads on the whole was in the order of ‘tolerance’, ‘economic’, ‘empathy’, ‘recognition’, ‘social’, ‘guidance’, ‘priority’, ‘facilitation’ and ‘equity’. While there existed a vast dissimilarity in the relationship performance of dimensions of the two study districts, the two labourer categories and the three union membership categories were in agreement with regard to dimension – wise relationship performance. The socio – economic and psychological factors namely, management orientation, persuasiveness, gregariousness, education, ability to handle conflicts and labour use efficiency put together contributed significantly to the relationship of farmer – labourer dyads and explained 68 per cent of the variation in the relationship of farmer – respondents. In case of labourer – respondents, the variables participation in decision making with farmers, employment days and education were observed to be significantly contributing to the farmer – labourer relationship and explained 20 per cent of variation in the relationship.