Isolation and identification of viruses from waterfowls seen in Kerala

Abstract

In the recent years, frequent outbreaks of poultry diseases have caused significant economic losses and among the various sources of infection, freeflying migratory birds and waterfowls are reported to be an important source for the introduction of disease to domestic flocks. These freeflying pirds and waterfowls abound in the waterlogged areas of Kerala especially Alleppey, Kottayam, Thrissur and Malappuram districts. Heavy losses were reported each year due to severe outbreaks of duck plague and duck pasturellosis resulting in the wiping out of the duck population in the state. This may be due to the introduction of the disease agents by migratory waterfowls. Hence a study was undertaken to elucidate the role of waterfowls in the spread of diseases to domestic poultry and ducks. A total of 52 waterfowls were caught from different parts of Kerala of which 15 were lesser whistling teals and 37 were gargany. Postmortem examination of these birds were carried out and the required materials were collected. Impression smears from the cut surface of the liver revealed intranuclear inclusion bodies in the hepatic cells in four cases (Bird Nos. 17, 23, 27 and 49) and two haemagglutinating agents were isolated from the cloacal swabs of the bird numbers 18 and 22.

The haemagglutinating agents developed lesions in the chicken embryos which died 3 to 5 days after inoculation. the allantoamniotic fluid of the affected embryos agglutinated teal and chicken erythrocytes. The lesions exhibited by the embryos infected with Ta were congestion of the CAM and embryos while in T22 the embryos were stunted, curled and at

the same time congested.

The liver of the embryo had

yellowish brown patches. The haemagglutination activity of both the viral isolates were tested with red cells of various species like cattle, horse, human '0', duck, rabbit and pig but was negative in all cases.

Both the isolates lost their infectivity and haemagglutination property at 56°C for 30 min. the infectivity and HA activity of the viral isolates T18 and T22 were retained at pH 7.2 and were completely destroyed at pH 3.2 and pH 9. Both the isolates were sensitive to treatment with chloroform, revealing both as enveloped viruses, wherein the infectivity was completely lost and HA activity was considerably reduced. In the case of Tl8 HA activity was reduced from 512 to 16 and for T22 from 128 to 8. The nucleic acid types of the viral isolates were confirmed by inoculating the isolates to chicken embryo fibroblast cultures pretreated with 100 µg and 200 µg per ml of IudR which led to the conclusion that Ta was a RNA

virus and T22 a DNA virus.

The ELD50 of Ta and T22 were 107

ELD50/ml and 106 ELD50/ml. The ICPI, MDT and IVPI. were calculated as for NDV. The ICPI for the isolates were 0.83

and 0.30 for T18 and T22 respectively, MDT was 120 hr for both and the IVPI was calculated to be zero in both cases, indicating that both the isolates were nonpathogenic. In cell cultures both the isolates produced CPE which affected the whole monolayer by 96 hrs. In the case of Tl8 the CPE was characterised by rounding and clumping of cells, the infected cells showing a tendency to get separated from the neighbouring cells leaving long cytoplasmic strands, syncytium formation with four or five nuclei and severe cytoplasmic vacuolation. For T22 the CPE was characterised by rounding and cytoplasmic vacuolation and karryorhexis. Intranuclear and intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies could be demonstrated. The pathogenicity studies of both the isolates were carried out in one week old and six week old ducklings and chicken, for which both were nonpathogenic and did not exhibit any clinical signs or mortality. But viral infection was established in six week old chicks by virus isolation till the 14th day of infection from the cloacal swabs for both the isolates. The sera collected from these birds revealed an antibody titre of 16 for T¬18 and 8 for T22 indicating the infection. The antigenic relationship of the isolates was examined with NDV, EDS-76 and fish viruses (FV and F6), of which T22 did not show any antigenic similarity with any of the viruses. But T1B on the contrary exhibited antigenic relationship with the fishviruses FV and F6 but no antigenic

similarity with NDV and EDS-76. The antigenic similarity exhibited by T18 with the fish viruses leads to the conclusion that waterfowls may be disseminating the viruses responsible for the outbreak of epizootic ulcerative syndrome in fishes. The morphological features of T18 by electronmicroscopy

revealed an enveloped virus with a size of 150-185 nm with pleomorphic forms and peplomers of a length of 18-20 nm. Except the length of the peplomers it similated a paramyxovirus. The morphology of T22 was not studied due to technical defects.