Evaluation of water hyacinth co- composts for nutrient retention in lateritic soil

Abstract

Water hyacinth is a serious menace in low land ecosystems and it’s spread has threatened water quality and aquatic life. Various biological, chemical and physical methods that have been employed to control the weed has yielded minimal results. Hence management through utilization is a viable strategy. It can be effectively utilized in many ways to support crop production. Co-composting has been proved as a promising technique for safe and quick disposal of the weed by utilizing the co-substrates viz., poultry manure, sawdust, biochar, glyricidia, paddy straw, dried leaves and cattle manure. As the weed accumulates N, P, K and other essential nutrients, compost made from water hyacinth can be utilized for improving soil fertility and crop production. Hence, the present investigation entitled “Evaluation of water hyacinth co-composts for nutrient retention in lateritic soil” was under taken in the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry at College of Agriculture, Vellanikkara during 2020-2021. The objectives were; (i) To find out the suitable combination of water hyacinth and co-substrates for enhancing the quality of water hyacinth composts (ii) To assess the nutrient retention capacity of different co-composts in lateritic soil. Different co-substrates were collected from nearby areas and water hyacinth was collected from Kole lands of Thrissur. Water hyacinth and co-substrates were characterized prior to composting. Water hyacinth co-composts (vermi compost) were prepared using the aforesaid substrates in concrete tanks. The physical and chemical properties of the composting mixtures were recorded at 40 days interval starting from 20 days of composting until 100 days. The yield of water hyacinth co-composts was estimated and the various co-composts were characterized for their physical and chemical properties. Incubation study was conducted to evaluate the nutrient retention capacity of different water hyacinth co-composts in lateritic soil during December 2020 with eight treatments and three replications (soil+ 7 co-composts and soil alone as absolute control). The lateritic soil for study was collected from Instructional Farm, Vellanikkara and analysed for chemical properties. Compost amended soils were incubated for a period of 28 days and nutrient retention capacity (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, B, Zn) was estimated at 4 different time periods after incubation (7, 14, 21, 28 days). Data on characterization of co-substrates revealed that substrates vary in their chemical properties and nutrient content. Among the co-substrates, poultry manure possessed many favourable characteristics. Changes in physical and chemical properties of composting mixtures at different intervals indicated the progress of composting process and stage of compost maturity. All the co-substrates gave reasonably good yield of water hyacinth co-composts. A notable increase in compost yield to an extent of 159.7 per cent was realized in the biochar treatment. Addition of co-substrates improved the bulk density and porosity of water hyacinth co-composts. Application of co-substrates improved the pH of final compost. Highest increase was noticed in the treatment with paddy straw. Addition of paddy straw had significant adverse effect on the electrical conductivity of final co-compost (170.6 % increase in EC over water hyacinth sole treatment) and all the other treatments showed EC below maximum permissible limit for plant growth. The total carbon content of all the co-composts was higher than water hyacinth sole compost. Nitrogen content of the co-compost was improved to a greater extent by the application of paddy straw and poultry manure. Co-composts with sawdust, biochar and dried leaves had significantly lower quantity of nitrogen compared to water hyacinth sole compost. Glyricidia and poultry manure were highly effective in improving total phosphorus content of the co-compost. Total potassium content of water hyacinth compost was significantly improved with the addition of co-substrates like paddy straw and biochar, the extent of increase being 192 and 170 per cent, respectively. Carbon to nitrogen ratio of water hyacinth co-compost was significantly lowered by using poultry manure as a co-substrate. Addition of poultry manure improved all the three secondary nutrients viz., Ca, Mg and sulphur to a higher magnitude. No favourable effect was noticed on the boron content of co-compost by the addition of different co-substrates. However, Fe and Mn levels of final co-composts were considerably lower than the water hyacinth sole compost. This could be considered as a favourable effect of co-composting of water hyacinth with different substrates. Zinc content of the co-compost was significantly improved by the inclusion of co-substrate particularly with the use of poultry manure and dried leaves. Copper content of the co-compost was significantly higher with the addition of poultry manure as co-substate. The addition of co-compost to lateritic soil, improved retention of nutrients particularly nitrogen. The only exception was co-compost with paddy straw (0.9 per cent decrease in the nitrogen retention capacity). Irrespective of the treatments, cocompost retained all the phosphorus and boron present in the co-compost amended soil. The soil’s potassium, magnesium, sulphur and zinc retention capacity could be improved when amended with water hyacinth co-compost. In general, soil with biochar co-compost showed significantly high retention capacity with respect to plant nutrients particularly nitrogen. Further study should be focused on field experiments to test the agronomic efficiency of different water hyacinth co-composts, testing suitability of various crop residues and organic wastes as co-substrates and to derive suitable substrate combinations and ratios to eliminate the adverse effects of co-substrate on compost quality.