Abstract:
The study entitled “Integrated nutrient management in minisett cultivation of elephant foot yam [Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson]” was conducted at the Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram to standardise the minisett size in elephant foot yam and to investigate the effect of integrated nutrient management practices on growth, yield, quality and economics of cultivation and to study the rooting and tuberisation pattern of minisett planted elephant foot yam. The investigation consisted of two experiments; standardisation of minisett corm size and integrated nutrient management practices (field experiment) and rooting and tuberisation pattern study (pot culture) and was undertaken during April to November 2018 and 2019. The first experiment was laid out in RBD with 15 treatment combinations and a control, replicated thrice. The treatments comprised three minisett corm sizes (s1-200 g, s2-300 g and s3-400 g) and five integrated nutrient management practices (i1-100 per cent NPK, i2-75 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost, i3-75 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I + AMF, i4-50 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost, i5-50 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I + AMF). The minisett corms and control corms (1 kg) of elephant foot yam var. Gajendra were planted at a spacing of 60 x 60 cm and 90 x 90 cm respectively. The recommended dose of N, P and K (100:50:150 kg NPK ha-1 ) for elephant foot yam was modified based on soil test data. Substitution of N with coir pith compost was carried out on N equivalent basis, and P and K were given through chemical sources. The pot culture experiment was laid out in CRD with 14 plants per treatment with the same treatments as the field experiment. The number of days taken for 100 per cent sprouting of seed corms varied between minisett corms and control corms and the latter sprouted early. The minisett corm s3 (400 g) recorded taller plants, higher leaf area index, pseudostem 281 girth and canopy spread. Application of 100 per cent NPK (i1) as chemical fertilizer produced taller plants and higher canopy spread during later stages compared to INM practices. Among the INM treatments, i3 (75 % NPK with 50 % N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I + AMF) found superior with respect to growth attributes such as plant height and canopy spread. The treatment combination s3i1 (400 g + 100 % NPK as chemical fertilizer) produced taller plants and recorded higher canopy spread. Among the interactions including INM practices, taller plants were produced by s3i3 and s3i5 and higher canopy spread was recorded with s3i2, s3i3 and s3i5. Control plants (1 kg) showed taller plants, higher pseudostem girth and canopy spread at all stages of observation. The s3 recorded higher yield attributes, corm yield (48.81 and 50.57 t ha-1 during first year and second year, respectively) and pooled corm yield (49.69 t ha1 ). The treatments, i1 (100 % NPK) recorded significantly the highest yield attributes and yield. Among the different INM practices, i3 recorded higher yield attributes and corm yield (38.26 and 45.37 t ha-1 during first year and second year, respectively), while corm yield in pooled mean analysis (41.82 t ha-1 ) was also higher in this treatment. The s3i1 (400 g + 100 % NPK as chemical fertilizer) produced significantly the highest yield attributes and yield among all the treatments. Among the INM combinations, s3i3 recorded higher yield attributes, corm yield and higher pooled mean of corm yield (51.29 t ha-1 ). Control recorded higher yield attributes than minisetts. Pooled analysis of corm yield ha-1 indicated that s3i1, s3i2, s3i3 and s3i5 were superior to control and s2i1, s2i2, s2i3 and s3i4 were on par with control. Quality attributes like starch, total sugar, crude protein and crude fibre content of corm were non significant with respect to the treatments. Higher dry matter content was obtained in i4 (50 % NPK with 50 % N substitution through coir pith compost). The lower content of oxalic acid was recorded with i5 and i4 and the higher content was in i1 (100 % NPK). The minisett corm s3 recorded superior results for nutrient content, uptake and nutrient harvest indices. The INM treatment, i3 recorded higher nutrient content and uptake, however the highest was recorded in i1 among all the treatments. The treatment s3i1 (400 g + 100 % NPK 282 through chemical fertilisers) recorded significantly the highest K uptake. Among the combinations including INM practices, s3i3 recorded higher K uptake during second year. The combinations, s3i1, s3i2, s3i3, s3i4 and s3i5 were found superior to control in case of nutrient uptake. Soil chemical properties after the field experiments were not significantly affected by the treatments. The treatment s3i1 (400 g + 100 % NPK) recorded the highest net income and BCR during both the years. The highest net income and BCR were recorded from s3i2 during first year and s3i3 during second year, and the two year mean of net income and BCR were also highest in the case of INM treatment s3i3. In pot culture study, chemical properties of potting medium at monthly intervals up to harvest were not significantly affected by the treatments except for organic carbon content. The treatment i3 (75 % NPK with 50 % N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I + AMF) recorded higher organic carbon content at 5 MAP. The minisett corm s3 excelled in rooting pattern and root anatomical parameters. Higher number of roots per plant was recorded in i2 and i3, however, these treatments were on par with i1 (100 % NPK). Higher weight of roots per plant was observed in i5, i4 and i3 and, root anatomical parameters were superior in i3. The interactions, s3i5, s3i4 and s3i3 recorded the highest weight of roots per plant. Higher root parameters were recorded in control than in minisetts and, in case of number of roots per plant s3i1, s3i2 and s3i3 at 4, 6 MAP and harvest, and s3i1 at 5 MAP recorded on par results with control. In the case of weight of roots per plant, s3i3 was on par with control at harvest. The roots of plants applied with AMF showed mycelial network from 3 MAP up to the harvest, and in the maximum growing stage of 5 MAP, vesicles were found in between the cells of the roots of AMF applied plants. Higher root colonization was observed in s3i3 at 5 MAP. Corm initiation was observed between 1 MAP and 2 MAP in control and between 2 MAP and 3 MAP in all other treatments. The s2 (300 g) during 3-4 MAP and s3 (400 g) during all other stages had significantly the highest corm bulking rate (CBR). Higher corm bulking efficiency (CBE) was recorded in s2 during 3-4 MAP, s1 during 4-5 MAP and 6 MAP-harvest and s3 during 5-6 MAP. 283 The INM treatment i3 showed superior results for CBR and CBE, however, higher CBR and CBE were recorded in i1 (100 % NPK) among all the treatments. The s3i1 (400 g + 100 % NPK)showed the highest CBR and CBE during 4-5 MAP and 5-6 MAP among all the treatments. Among the INM interactions, s3i3 during 3-4 MAP and 5-6 MAP; s3i2 during 4-5 MAP and s3i4 during 6 MAP-harvest recorded higher CBR. The s2i3 during 3-4 MAP, s1i3 during 4-5 MAP, s3i3 during 5-6 MAP and s1i5 during 6 MAP-harvest recorded higher CBE. Higher corm weight per plant was recorded with s3. The i1 recorded the higher corm weight per plant among all the treatments, and at 5 MAP, i1 was on par with i3. Among the INM treatments i2 at 3 MAP and i3 at all other stages recorded higher corm weight per plant. Among interactions, s3i3 produced higher corm weight, however, among all the treatments the highest corm weight was noted in s3i1 at all stages except at 4 MAP. Control produced significantly higher corm weight per plant than minisetts. Uptake of nitrogen at 3 MAP and uptake of phosphorus at harvest were higher in s3. The INM treatment i3 recorded higher microbial population and dehydrogenase activity in the potting medium and among the interactions, higher dehydrogenase activity was recorded with s3i3. Significant and positive correlations were observed between corm weight per plant vs. root anatomical parameters and nutrient uptake vs. root anatomical parameters. It is evident from the present study that planting of 400 g minisett corm resulted in better growth, yield and quality of elephant foot yam. Application of 75 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I [@ 10 g per pit (dry cow dung: PGPR mix-I in 50:1 proportion) - at planting and 2 MAP] + AMF (@ 10 g per pit - at the time of planting) in elephant foot yam resulted in superior growth, yield and quality under INM system. Planting of 400 g minisett and application of 75 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I + AMF under an INM system could be recommended for economic production of minisett elephant foot yam. Rooting and tuberisation of elephant foot yam were found superior in planting of 400 g minisett corm with application of 75 per cent NPK with 50 per cent N substitution through coir pith compost + PGPR mix-I + AMF.