Comparison of different techniques for the estimation of genotype-environment interaction

dc.contributor.advisor	Gopinathan Unnithan, V K
dc.contributor.author	Laly John, C
dc.date.accessioned	2020-06-12T05:16:58Z
dc.date.available	2020-06-12T05:16:58Z
dc.date.issued	1984
dc.identifier.citation	T-384	en_US
dc.identifier.sici	T-384	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7845
dc.description.abstract	The genotypic stability analyses of Eberhart and Russell (1966), Perkins and Jinks (1968), Freeman and Perkins (1971), Wricke (1966) and Shukla (1972) were studied in detail. The mistakes in the analysis of variance of Perkins and Jinks (1968) were corrected. The first three analyses which used the theory of regression explains a large part of the genotypic environment interaction. On the otherhand, when the regression cannot explain a large part of the genotype - environment interaction, Wrioke's ecovalence ratio and Shukla's stability variance could satisfactorily be used.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Department of Statistics, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Mannuthy	en_US
dc.subject	Phenotypic stability	en_US
dc.subject	Genotype environment interaction	en_US
dc.subject	Stability variance	en_US
dc.title	Comparison of different techniques for the estimation of genotype-environment interaction	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US