Development of subsurface pad irrigation system for tomato

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in the summer rice fallows of the Agricultural Research Station, Mannuthy during 1995 to develop and test subsurface pad irrigation system for tomato and to compare it with surface irrigation. The soil was sandy clay loam, medium in organic carbon and available potassium and high in available phosphorus. The eight treatments comprised of combination of four frequencies of irrigation (IW/CPE ratios of 1.2, 0.9, 0.6 and 0.3) and two irrigation systems (subsurface pad irrigation and surface irrigation). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Poly bags filled with saw dust placed 45 cm beneath the surface at the frequency of one pad for every four plants formed SSPI. Water was supplied to pads by laterals supplying 40 mm of water per irrigation.

The study revealed that tomato responded very well to irrigation. Biometric characters like plant height, number of leaves and leaf area index and yield attributing characters like number of flowers, number of fruits and total weight of fruits per plant were favourably influenced by frequent irrigation under both the systems of irrigation. The fruit yield increased with frequency of irrigation and maximum at the IW/CPE ratio of 1.2.

The plants irrigated by surface method grew taller, had more leaf area index, produced more number of green leaves, flowers, fruits and total fruit weight per plant compared to the plants irrigated under SSPI system at the irrigation frequencies of IW/CPE ratios 1.2, 0.9, and 0.6. But at the IW/CPE ratio of 0.3, the subsurface irrigated plants performed better than the surface irrigated plants both in terms of growth and yield attributing characters.

The crop receiving irrigations through SSPI systems consumed lesser amount of water at all the frequencies of irrigation compared to surface method. This decline at the IW/CPE ratios of 1.2, 0.9, 0.6 and 0.3 were to the tune of 22,30,40 and 18 per cent respectively. The soil moisture extraction from 0-15, 15-30 and 30-60 cm layers in SSPI was 62-70, 24-29 and 6-12 per cent respectively whereas in surface irrigation the respective values were 62-64, 22-23 and 13-15 per cent.

The soil moisture redistribution was rapid in the case of surface irrigation whereas it was gradual in the case of SSPI. Moisture content in the case of SSPI was maximum at the radial distance of 15 cm from the pad on either sides whereas in surface irrigation there was no remarkable difference in the moisture content with respect to radial distance from the plant.