Response of finger millet (Eleusine coracana(L.) Gaertn) to live mulch and stale seedbed
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of agronomy, college of agriculture, Vellayani
Abstract
The research work titled “Response of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.)
Gaertn) to live mulch and stale seedbed was conducted at College of Agriculture,
Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, during 2021-2023. The primary aim of the
study was to assess the effect of live mulch and stale seedbed on weed control, growth
and yield of finger millet.
The field experiment was conducted in the model organic farm at College of
Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala during summer 2022-23 (February
2023-May 2023). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with two
factors in three replications. The first factor was land preparation (L), viz., normal
seedbed (l1), stale seedbed with light raking (l2) and stale seedbed with flaming (l3) and
the second factor was live mulches (M) viz., no mulch (m1), cowpea (m2), green gram
(m3) and cluster bean (m4). The variety used in the study was PPR 2700 (Vakula). The
live mulches were sown in 1:1 proportion and left in the interrow spaces as organic
mulch by wheel hoe weeding at 50 per cent flowering stage (40 DAS of the mulch crop).
The crop was raised as per Ad hoc POP recommendations (organic) of Kerala
Agricultural University (KAU, 2017)
Stale seedbed with light raking (l2) resulted in taller plants of finger millet at 20
DAS, 40 DAS and harvest. It also produced higher tiller count at 20 DAS and 60 DAS
and higher DMP per plant at 20 DAS, 60 DAS and harvest.
In finger millet, cowpea live mulch (m2) recorded taller plants and DMP per
plant at all stages of observation. Tiller count was significant only at 20 DAS and 60
DAS and live mulching with cowpea resulted in higher tiller count at both stages
The interaction effect of land preparation and live mulches revealed that, in
finger millet the treatment l2m2 resulted in taller plants, higher tillers m-2 and DMP per
plant at 60 DAS and harvest.
Stale seedbed with flaming (l3) resulted in higher CGR and RGR at 20 DAS-40
DAS in finger millet, however, at both 40 DAS-60 DAS and 60 DAS-harvest, the
highest CGR and RGR were observed in l2.
Cowpea live mulch resulted in significantly higher CGR and RGR at 20 DAS-
40 DAS and LAI at 20 DAS and 40 DAS in finger millet.213
The CGR and RGR of finger millet at 20 DAS-40 DAS were also higher in l2m2.
However, l2m1 showed higher CGR and RGR at 40 DAS-60 DAS and l2m4 showed
higher CGR at 60 DAS- harvest.
Stale seedbed with light raking resulted in higher number of fingers per ear head
(12.87) and ear head weight (15.78 g) and it was comparable with l3. The treatment l2
also resulted in the highest number of productive tillers m-2 (45.3), 1000 grain weight
(1.50 g), grain yield (661 kg ha-1) and harvest index (0.310). The percentage increase in
grain yield in l2 compared to l1 was 17.25. The lowest weed index (20.47 %) was also
observed in l2.
The yield attributes of finger millet, productive tiller count (50.2 no. m-2), ear
head weight (18. 62 g) and 1000 grain weight were also higher in cowpea live mulch.
The grain yield of finger millet was also the highest in cowpea live mulch (717 kg
ha-1). Compared to control (without mulch), the percentage yield increase due to live
mulching with cowpea was 49.06. Cowpea live mulch also resulted in higher harvest
index (0.321) and the lowest weed index.
The treatment l2m2 resulted in higher number of productive tillers m-2 (53.3 no.
m-2), ear head weight and 1000 grain weight in finger millet. It also produced
significantly higher grain yield (832 kg ha-1) and harvest index (0.341) and the lowest
weed index (0.00). Compared to l1m1, the yield increase observed in l2m2 was 131.8 per
cent.
The crude protein content and starch content of finger millet grain was the
highest in l2.
The quality parameters, viz., crude protein content and starch content of finger
millet grain were also higher in cowpea live mulch.
The treatment l3m2 resulted in higher crude protein content of finger millet grain
(14.27%) and higher starch content in l2m2 (82.19%).
The N and P uptake by finger millet at harvest were found to be higher in l2 and
K uptake in l3.
Cowpea live mulch had the highest N and K uptake by finger millet. It also
recorded higher P uptake but comparable with m3 and m4.
The treatment l2m2 had the highest N and K uptake by finger millet at harvest
stage. It also recorded higher P uptake but comparable with l3m3.214
Stale seedbed with light raking resulted in lower N and P uptake by weeds and
SSB with flaming had lower K uptake by weeds at 60 DAS.
Cowpea had the lowest N uptake by weeds at 60 DAS, however, lower P and K
uptake by weeds were observed in green gram.
Among the treatments at 60 DAS, l3m2 resulted in lower N uptake by weeds,
however, l2m3 had lower P uptake and l3m1 had lower K uptake by weeds.
Land preparation did not significantly influence the dehydrogenase enzyme
activity at 60 DAS. However, treatment l3 resulted in the highest urease enzyme activity
in soil. Land preparation did not have any significant effect on SOC and available N
content in the soil at the post-harvest stage. However, l2 had the highest available P in
the soil and available K in l3.
Green gram resulted in the highest dehydrogenase enzyme activity in soil at 60
DAS. However, urease enzyme activity was the highest in cowpea (m2). At post-harvest
stage, m2 had the highest available N and K in the soil, however, higher available P in
m3.
The treatment l2m2 resulted in higher dehydrogenase and urease enzymes
activity in soil at 60 DAS. The treatment l1m2 resulted in significantly higher available
N and SOC in the soil at post-harvest stage. The available P in the soil was the highest
in l2m3. The treatment l2m2 had higher available K in the soil but comparable with l3m4.
SSB with flaming had the lowest total weed density, however, l2 had the lowest
total weed dry weight and the highest WCE.
Among the live mulches, cowpea live mulch had the lowest total density of
weeds, weed dry weight and the highest WCE at 60 DAS.
The treatment l2m2 had lower total weed density at 60 DAS. However, the lowest
dry weight of weeds was observed in l2m2 and l2m3. The highest WCE was observed in
l2m3.
Land preparation had remarkable effect on N, P and K content of live mulches
at 50 per cent flowering stage. Normal seedbed (l1) resulted in higher N content of live
mulches, P content in l2 and K content in l3.
Significant variations were observed in the N, P and K content of live mulches
at 50 per cent flowering stage. The treatment m2 showed higher N content, however, m3
showed higher P and K content. Plant height and branches per plant did not show215
variation among the mulches. The DMP showed significant variations among the live
mulches and the highest DMP was observed in m2.
Amongst the treatments, l1m2 recorded higher N content of live mulches, P
content in l1m4 and K content in l3m3. Live mulches showed significant variations in
plant height and number of branches among different land preparation methods. In
cowpea, taller plants and higher branches per plant were observed in NSB, in green
gram, taller plants and branches per plant were observed in SSB with flaming and in
cluster bean, SSB with light raking resulted in taller plants and higher branches per
plant.
Among the treatments, the highest gross return (₹ 83200 ha-1), net return (₹
29458 ha-1) and BCR (1.55) were observed in l2m2.
From the results, it could be concluded that stale seedbed with light raking
followed by live mulching with cowpea in 1:1 proportion (l2m2) and its incorporation at
50 per cent flowering stage using wheel hoe weeder could be recommended as a cost-
effective weed management practice for better weed control, higher yield, net return
and B:C ratio in finger millet. The yield increase observed in l2m2 over non stale seedbed
without live mulch (l1m1) (control) was 131.8 per cent and increase in net return over
l1m1 was ₹ 31800 ha-1.
Description
Keywords
Finger millet, FORESTRY, AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES and LANDSCAPE PLANNING::Plant production::Agronomy
Citation
175936